Against what a floor gets today.
Almost every commercial space is marketed one of two ways: someone commissions visual work for it, or the plan goes out as a PDF and the space is explained in person. These pages set StudiO beside both, including the parts each of them still does better.
StudiO vs sending the plan PDF
The real default, and the one worth reading first: what a sheet drawn for builders does to a reader who is not one.
StudiO vs commissioning renders
Brief, queue and stills, set against a model derived from the plan and published on a link. Where the commission still wins is stated on the page.
The vocabulary underneath
Title blocks, floor plates, wall roles and draft geometry, defined for someone who has to read a plan without having drawn one.
What is being compared.
StudiO reads the floorplan you already hold. On a vector PDF it takes the scale from the title block; on a photograph or a scan it estimates the scale and states that it has. It measures every wall segment, types each one as exterior, core or partition, and detects columns with the evidence that found them. What comes back is an inspectable model in the browser, a vector plan fitted to it, and a hosted leasing site on one link.
That output is draft geometry. It is not construction-grade BIM and not a measured survey, which is the line that decides most of the comparisons below.
Upload in 2 minutes. Review in 1 hour. Launch in 24 hours.